Skip to main content

A Bit About the Challenge of Living...Buildings


Just because I'm an Environmental student does not mean I was born wanting to make my clothes out of hemp, live in a cobb house, and eat only raw/vegetarian friendly foods. I'm a Jersey girl at heart, who happened to spend her summers camping in the Northern part of the state canoeing, swimming, hiking and singing. I really grew to love spending time on the Appalachian Trail, the challenge of long, multi-day hikes, the danger of bears and other large animals, and the wonder of how life goes on despite everything happening in our cities.

As I got older, I could feel the natural world around me start to change. Summers got hot- like 106 degrees hot. We couldn't hike the normal trails because water sources were dry, we couldn't swim in the lake because so much water evaporated the fecal count was unsafe, and something called the gypsy moth was plaguing the entire county, devouring everything green in its path. I realized then that maybe things don't continue on despite whatever we do; maybe we have to think about and consciously decide to help our planet to keep her healthy.

I decided I wanted to learn everything I could about the corks and screws of how it all works, because then we can find solutions.

And here I am, looking for design and construction solutions- because it is not realistic to ask people to stop building, expanding, growing, and developing in their lives. But it may just be possible to change the way we do it.

The Living Building Challenge is the brainchild of the International Living Building Institute and it asks us, "How can we make a building that works like a tree?". Even in my undergraduate work, where we were singing the praises of the LEED certification process- we weren't actually making anything better; we were just trying to hurt things less.
I like the way it was put in a conference i attended over the summer: If I am in Florida and I'm trying to get to Maine, I can't get there by driving towards Texas. The insanity of the things we do in design is that we think if we drive towards Texas slower, we'll get to Maine. ie We cannot heal this Earth by using the same techniques and thought processes that got us here, and things like LEED-while they slow us down- are still headed towards Texas.

The Living Building Challenge (LBC) asks us to account for how far we import our materials; heavy-density things can come from no further than 300 miles, consultants can come from about 1200 miles, etc. The impact of bringing in things like bamboo, even though it is renewable, can be high because we must ship it in from at least 6,000 miles away to install it here in New Jersey.
We must use Net Zero energy annually; the building is designed to utilize as much daylight and passive energies as possible. Then, on-site renewables will power the rest of the building site.
LBC additionally requires Net Zero water and net zero waste, habitat exchange, windows/access to daylight and views for every occupiable space among its stringent design 'petals'

Then, there is the RED LIST- a group of chemicals/ingredients that are not permitted to be present in any part of the design, materials, or construction of the building that include but are not limited to: PVC, cadmium, mercury and lead.

If we want to create a building that is like a tree, i.e. it filters water, makes soil and uses sunlight for energy- we can't have it composed of toxic, non-biodegradable, and/or foreign oil-eating materials.

We will have to stop believing that the newest and fastest technology must be the best, and remembering to look back at some of the simpler, primitive, and more effective techniques to gain our needed result.







The Living Building Challenge is an attempt to turn our car around.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eating Garbage

Garbage is Beautiful. And let me tell you why. In 2010, the EPA estimated the US produced over 240 million tons of municipal solid waste. That is over four pounds of garbage, per person, per day. We travel through our day throwing things ‘away’. But where do they go? Does your trash go to a landfill, incinerator, or Waste to Energy Plant? Currently in NJ, thirteen counties have solid waste landfills and five counties have resource recovery facilities (incinerators). Of the five counties with resource recovery facilities, three also have landfills to receive waste that cannot be burnt. Eight counties have awarded waste disposal contracts and require that all waste be sent to one facility for disposal. The remaining thirteen counties have a free market system and transporters may send waste out of the county or state. The majority of us don’t know information like this, and don’t care as long as we don’t have to look at it. But if we were forced to look at the garb...

Covid, baby

Working in the sustainability field has been turned on its head during the Coronavirus pandemic. I went on a short hiatus to become a Mom (Elliott was born in March of 2020 only a few days before lockdown in NJ), and when I resurfaced, our approach needed to be different, here are some examples: Typically, the balance between ample fresh air within a building and energy use would result in driving the building toward lower energy use. Now, the ability to increase the outdoor air is desirable and is carrying more importance as a design consideration. We almost always pursued green cleaning operations and maintenance plans with our projects, however the Green Seal certified (or other healthy for people) cleaning products do not disinfect to the level desired for Covid- forcing teams to decide between abandoning their healthy cleaning policies and safety. Everything is packaged and sealed, and wrapped again. Cafes stopped allowing refillable coffee cups, towns that had plastic ba...

Breaking News- Renewable Energy can STILL power our planet!

Yesterday, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released an exciting report about the potential of Renewables and the world energy market. Over 120 world experts produced a scientific document over 1,000 pages long that provides a solution to 'business as usual' carbon emissions. They believe that we could meet the globe's energy needs with 80% renewable energies by mid-century . This would be a socially, politically, and physically strenuous task. If we eliminate all the complications and shift our paradigm, we still have issues like that which Ramon Pichs, Co-Chair of the Working Group III, added: “The report shows that it is not the availability of the resource, but the public policies that will either expand or constrain renewable energy development over the coming decades. Developing countries have an important stake in this future—this is where most of the 1.4 billion people without access to electricity live yet also where some of the best conditi...